|
by
Stanley P. Caine, Adrian College President
The
recently issued Knight Commission report, developed by a group
of higher education and corporate leaders-including our recent
Commencement speaker, Dr. John DiBiaggio-deserves careful attention.
Entitled "A Call to Action: Reconnecting College Sports and
Higher Education," it describes a variety of ills afflicting
intercollegiate athletics at many major institutions: low graduation
rates, chronic violations of NCAA rules, uncontrolled spending.
An overriding theme is a rising tide of commercialism that has
created a "widening chasm between higher education's ideals
and big-time college sports."
For
the past six years, as a member of key councils of the NCAA, I
have spent considerable time working on issues related to intercollegiate
athletics. In the process, I have gained great respect for leaders
at the NCAA and on college and university campuses who are working
hard to maintain the integrity of intercollegiate athletics in
a society that apparently has an insatiable appetite for sports.
I have also become increasingly alarmed at the kinds of excesses
that the Knight Commission describes.
Clearly
we are at an important crossroads in college athletics. We must
act now to combat the growing public cynicism about the real purpose
of intercollegiate athletics and to create a better environment
for the education of the many men and women who choose to participate
in them.
My thoughts
about where to begin are anchored in the philosophy that undergirds
intercollegiate athletics at Adrian. They reflect the approach
taken by the Commission.
1.Treat
athletes as students first. The Knight Commission has a number
of suggestions that would help: fewer contests, playing schedules
that better fit the academic requirements and calendars of the
institutions, reintegrating academic support services for athletes
into the regular academic structures of the institutions. I would
eliminate financial assistance based on athletics and provide
it solely on the basis of need or academic merit, but that may
be a bridge too far for many institutions.
2.Coaches
should be hired and evaluated primarily as educators. The chief
justification for college and university athletics is that they
contribute to the educational development of students. If we embrace
this philosophy, it is inappropriate to evaluate athletic programs
and coaches solely, or even principally, on the basis of win-loss
records and/or the number of spectators in the stands. Shouldn't
coaches be evaluated and rewarded on the basis of their contributions
to the education of students with whom they come in contact?
3.Athletics
budgets should be a part of the larger budgets of colleges and
universities. Separating the financing of athletics from other
financial dimensions of institutions encourages what Cedric Dempsey,
president of the NCAA, has called an athletics "arms race"
that threatens to bankrupt athletics departments and adversely
affect entire universities. Appropriate compensation for coaches
or the building of a new stadium belongs on the same agenda as
the need for additional faculty in the English Department or a
new science facility.
The
forces that the Knight Commission describes impact every college
and university in the country, although the Division III institutions
like Adrian are somewhat less directly affected because of their
smaller size and more focused missions. I do not underestimate
the leadership challenge facing presidents, governing boards,
coaches and athletic directors at major institutions who seek
to change the present course of intercollegiate athletics. Their
success will depend, to a degree, on the willingness of the public,
especially alumni, to moderate their demands and expectations.
Managing the media frenzy that surrounds athletics is also a formidable
task. It will take time and determination to turn things around,
but perhaps the Knight Commission report can become the catalyst
for a serious reform of intercollegiate athletics.
|